Being courted dating Ww sexstripchat
In order to demonstrate that you have assimilated the central argument and proof of another scholar's critical interpretation, you must be able to summarize and even compose a precis of an argument.
A summary or a precis is NOT a personal interpretation of a work or an expression of your opinion of the idea; it is, rather, an exact replica in miniature of the work, often reduced to one-quarter to one-fifth of its size, in which you express the complete argument! First, you must understand the complete work so that you can abstract the central argument and express it cogently and completely. Write a precis of the article in which you state the entire argument and present the logical progression (the development) of the argument. Reduce the article to one-fifth to one-quarter of its original length and omit nothing from the essential argument.
Next, you must develop the argument exactly as the writer has presented it AND reduce the work by 75-80% of its size. This is, in reality, the key to the whole enterprise! Type the precis and begin with your abstraction of the central, inform- ing idea of the article.
Of course, this is possible when you consider exactly how you "learn" to read the work. When you read the material, it is probable that you will understand only those parts which have associations within your own experience (intellectual, emotional, physical, etc.) How you actually go about writing a precis depends largely on your ability to restate the writer's central ideas after you have assimilated them in your own mind. Having understood and written the central idea, present the essential argument in as cogent manner as possible.
by Constance De Vereaux A well-written précis should be a serviceable substitute for the original work.
The goal is to preserve the core essence of the work in a manner that is both clear and concise.