Carbon dating is bullshit Sexy single woman for crolive cam
He sent a link to a mid-July entry in The Thinking Atheist. Philip Ball, the former physical science editor for Nature when the carbon dating results were published, recently wrote: “It’s fair to say that, despite the seemingly definitive tests in 1988, the status of the Shroud of Turin is murkier than ever.” If we wish to be scientific we must admit we do not know how old the cloth is.But if the newer thread is about half of what was tested – and some evidence suggests that – it is possible that the cloth is from the time of Christ.No one has a good idea how front and back images of a crucified man came to be on the cloth.Yes, it is possible to create images that look similar.
I’ve often heard New Atheists complain that they have a bad reputation. It was a good thing, too, to read what Danusha wrote because four days ago a reader had written to me about the video. So what, the reader said, it is out there and getting attention; you should show it. It was probably a mixture of older threads and newer threads woven into the cloth as part of a medieval repair.It was making the rounds on New Atheist blogs and such. Recent robust statistical studies add weight to this theory.