Fbi uncovers political dating scandal
Any evidence that the FBI uncovered has still not been made public.The government says no final decision has been made, however the case is clearly progressing as Clinton aide Bryan Pagliano, who worked on her private server, was granted immunity by the Justice Department earlier this month.There are whisperings going on, Career agents have suggested to the New York Post that the FBI director is being STONEWALLED by the Obama administration.They are further suggesting that Hillary Clinton BROKE the law (nothing new there) BUT for political reasons could get away with it…‘You don’t start granting people close to Clinton immunity unless you are seriously looking at charges against your target,’ one of Gasparino’s sources said.Clinton has publicly said that using a private email account attached to a homebrew server was a ‘mistake.’ Mainly ‘because it’s caused all this uproar and commotion.’ She’s defended the practice by pointing to her predecessors including Secretaries of States Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, who were appointed by Republicans.As Peter Neufeld, co-founder of the Innocence Project, put it, “The FBI’s three-decade use of microscopic hair analysis to incriminate defendants was a complete disaster.” reported that flawed forensic hair matches might have led to possibly hundreds of wrongful convictions for rape, murder, and other violent crimes, dating back at least to the 1970s.
Following revelations published in recent years, the two groups are helping the government with the country’s largest ever post-conviction review of questioned forensic evidence.The massive review raises questions about the veracity of not just expert hair testimony, but also the bite-mark and other forensic testimony offered as objective, scientific evidence to jurors who, not unreasonably, believed that scientists in white coats knew what they were talking about.She’s said any classified material found among the emails now that they’re public is due to retroactive classification and none of her messages were marked classified at the time.published a story so horrifying this weekend that it would stop your breath: “The Justice Department and FBI have formally acknowledged that nearly every examiner in an elite FBI forensic unit gave flawed testimony in almost all trials in which they offered evidence against criminal defendants over more than a two-decade period before 2000.” “Of 28 examiners with the FBI Laboratory’s microscopic hair comparison unit, 26 overstated forensic matches in ways that favored prosecutors in more than 95 percent of the 268 trials reviewed so far.” The shameful, horrifying errors were uncovered in a massive, three-year review by the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and the Innocence Project.
Without such political will, agents have begun whispering to their friends in the private sector, telling them Comey is getting stonewalled, writes reporter Charles Gasparino.
The official government line is a ‘no comment’ from the FBI.